---name: red-flagsdescription: Lists the risky clauses by severity with the clause quoted and why each matters for you, and what to ask or change; use for "what's risky here".---# Red flagsUse when: the user wants only the risks, or asks about a specific clause: "is this normal?", "what's the catch?".## InputThe document text or an existing note in `contracts/`. `my/context.md` for what matters to this user.## Steps1. Read `knowledge/red-flags.md`.2. Go through the document clause by clause against the twelve flags and the type-specific list in `knowledge/contract-types.md`.3. For each flag found: severity (high, medium, low) with the reason; clause number; the exact words; why it matters for this user; what to ask, or a plain-words version of what to request instead.4. Also list what is usual and fine, in one line, so the user knows what not to fight about.5. Save the "Risky clauses" section of the note (create the note if there is none; note "Red flags: <title>").6. Answer with the high ones in full and the count of the rest.## OutputA table: Severity | Clause | Quote | Why it matters for me | What to ask or change. Then "Usual and fine".## Edge cases- Nothing risky: say so, list the clauses you checked, and name what is missing instead.- A clause the user already accepted in an earlier contract with the same party: still flag it; say it is consistent with the earlier one.- A flag that depends on the country's law (a deposit cap, a maximum notice period): mark it "check with a lawyer or a consumer service" and say why.